{"id":12861,"date":"2026-08-06T14:43:01","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T12:43:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/?post_type=project&#038;p=12861"},"modified":"2026-08-06T14:43:02","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T12:43:02","slug":"clarification-of-a-term-used-inconsistently-in-discourse","status":"publish","type":"project","link":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/project\/clarification-of-a-term-used-inconsistently-in-discourse\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarification of a term used inconsistently in discourse"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On behalf of a company, we have analysed why studies on the \u2018simultaneous use\u2019 of two products arrive at conflicting results \u2013 and what definition lies behind each one.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"kategorie":[69],"class_list":["post-12861","project","type-project","status-publish","hentry","kategorie-studie"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project\/12861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/project"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project\/12861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12862,"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/project\/12861\/revisions\/12862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kategorie","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ipe-evaluation.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kategorie?post=12861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}